To
appear in 2003 Wall Street Journal's "Classroom Edition" and also
Prentice
Hall classroom textbook.
Should
the government do more to regulate financial markets?
Yes.
Financial
markets work best when investors are fully informed and the markets are free of
fraud and manipulation.
They
also work better when there isn’t a breakdown of management control at
companies, or the threat of failure of one financial institution leading to the
failure of others and in turn a possible collapse in the market. These are not
problems that can be solved by individuals’ self-interests working things out
in the marketplace. Instead this is where the government is needed to make
markets more stable and improve the way they work.
In
an unregulated market, investors will not have enough information to guide
their investments, which should not be based on rumor and hearsay. Companies
have incentives not to share information, such as bad news about themselves or
information about others that is not already known in the marketplace. That’s
why regulators require companies to fully disclose information. That way, the
entire market is better informed. This results in a greater willingness of
firms or individuals to invest. Better rules are needed now to improve
disclosure, especially in financial transactions such as “derivatives,” which
are complex financial contracts whose values are “derived” from the price of
something else such as a commodity or security.
Fraud
and the manipulation of market prices rob investors of a fair return on their
money and this discourages investment and harms the entire economy. But
possible gains from cheating apparently have become more of an incentive to
many than the loss of a good reputation, so destructive activities continue. A large share of financial markets are not
covered by anti-fraud and anti-manipulation prohibitions. Strict rules against fraud and manipulation
are needed that apply to all financial transactions, even those that occur
outside the formal securities exchanges.
Another
reason regulations are important is because risks taken by one brokerage firm
can harm not only that firm but other companies as well. When a business fails
it harms not only its employees, clients, vendors and creditors but also the
firms that lent money to the creditors, clients and vendors. Yet this potential
loss to others does not restrain firms from taking greater risks.
In
order to limit harm to others, better regulations are needed. We need new
investment rules for the managers of pension funds and insurance companies
because of a new class of high risk securities and derivatives . The government
also needs to set standards so that adequate collateral is used to back up
financial transactions. Lastly, the government needs to encourage, if not
require, that clearing houses be used to make sure trades are completed in
full.
U.S.
financial markets did not become world class until after prudential regulations
made them honest and more stable. Today
they are suffering from a lack of trust in confidence – not over-regulation.
Randall
Dodd
Director,
Financial Policy Forum
Washington,
D.C.